Harry won the referee again with a 5-for-8 win! The Thunder lost 8 free throws in the final quarter, giving you a chance to miss

On June 6, the NBA Finals were too controversial. The Pacers rushed to chase points in a flash, but the Thunder punished 8 goals in a row. The referee again staged an 8-to-5 shot, but Halliburton scored another final shot! In this game between the Thunder and the Pacers, the referee's call was once again very controversial. When the Pacers made a 12-2 wave in the 4th quarter, they saw hope of a reversal. At this time, the referee took action and started to steal the show and gave the Thunder free throws in succession. Unfortunately, the referee's help was useless this time.

In terms of the number of shots between the two sides, the Thunder had nearly 20 more times than the Pacers, but they did not widen the score. The Pacers played very toughly in the last quarter. Turner and Toppin made three-pointers in a row, hitting a 12:2 offensive frenzy, and even chasing the score difference between the two sides to 94:98. As a result, the referee's performance came at 5 minutes and 57 seconds.

first gave Alexander two free throws, and the score difference was expanded to 6 points through the free throw. The Pacers responded at this time. In the next round, Alexander continued to free, 4 free throws in 30 seconds, directly expanding the gap, while the Pacers were still making an inch, and Halliburton made a layup and chased him to 4 points. At this time, the shameless shot appeared. Although Alexander scored in the next round, the referee gave him the next two free throws. Not only him, but Jaylen Williams also made free throws. At the critical moment, the two men made 8 free throws in a row.

Then in the 2 minutes and 52 seconds, the referee gave Alexander a whistle, and he had to let him continue to punish him. It's not that you have already punished 8 goals, all of them were in the fourth quarter. Don't you think it's a bit outrageous? Which team can have so many whistles at critical moments? In fact, they can no longer score goals, and the Pacers have also opened on the outside, but they can't resist giving free throws as long as they don't score.

The biggest difference between this and the Knicks is that when the Pacers scored at a critical moment, the Knicks could not score, so they would be reversed. The Thunder could not score at a critical moment, and the referee forced a 5-for-8 shot to the whistle. I can only say that this kind of whistle is indeed very unfair, and the funny thing is that under the same scale, the referee did not give a foul after the Pacers were knocked down.

For example, in the fourth quarter, there is one and a half minutes left and the score difference is 3 points, Nesmith made a layup on the Pacers, Dort hit him and knocked him away, and then gave him a big hat. At this time, this round was not a foul. Alexander's fourth energy-saving energy-saving eight free throws in half the quarter, and the Pacers didn't foul if they were beaten. Is this reasonable?

At 22.1 seconds in the 4th quarter, Siakam and Thunder players competed for rebounds, and were directly pushed out by Wallace of the Thunder. The referee can not call a foul. Is it reasonable? Fortunately, Halliburton won the final victory again, proving that in the basketball world, the God of Basketball will stand on the side that is more worthy of winning.