This is the reason why Chelsea beat Paris Saint-Germain in the Club World Cup. It turns out that these things are causing it.

Paris was beaten 0-3 by Chelsea in the Club World Cup final, and its possession rate was purely invalid pass control.

The Ligue 1 giants who were praised before the game went from coaches to players to sleepwalking together. The high-pressure was crushed by the Blues' hard bones in the midfield. They made more than 30 mistakes in passing and receiving the ball and received the red card. They deserved it.

Paris's 66% possession rate is all about moisture, and there is no threatening ball in the 30-meter area.

Enrique's pass-by-control system has been thoroughly studied by Premier League teams, and the three midfielder's technical flows were closely matched by Chelsea's meat grinder.

Vitinia lost seven passes in the first half and dared to stick the ball. When she was cut off, she spread her hands and complained to the referee - the airs of technical poverty alleviation are brought to the finals. Do you really think Chelsea is a relegation team?

The data will not be lying: Paris created one excellent opportunity in the whole game, and 5 of the 8 shots were shots outside the penalty area.

In contrast, Chelsea's 10 shots and 5 shots were all from counterattacks, and two of the three goals were Paris's own pass mistakes and gave a gift.

possession rate exceeded 60%, but goalkeeper Donaluma touched the ball 46 times and won the whole game. This is not a pass-by tactic, which is clearly a goalkeeper's practice game.

What is even more embarrassing is the collapse of mentality.

When the midfielder Ashraf deliberately kicked Muderick down and escaped the red card. Before the end of the game, Ramos took revenge and pushed the man to red, and led the head coach Enrique to rush into the field to cause trouble.

The arrogance of technical poverty alleviation was crushed and rolled around, and 80,000 viewers on the scene watched the joke.

This miserable defeat broke through the illusion of Ligue 1 technical flow.

Paris suffered a defeat in the Premier League in the Champions League knockout stage for three consecutive years, and the last time he won the English team was four years ago.

The so-called advantage of ball control encounters a real high-intensity confrontation, and the ending is that Chelsea uses 34% to score a three-ball difference - football is ultimately a sport that compares who sends the ball into the net, not who passes more.

I said that Paris midfielder has no hardness

Vitinia, a relegation team in the Premier League, cannot play as a starting player

possession of 66% of the ball and shot 8 times? I was still stubborn in the seven-game Barcelona

Enrique was still stubborn in the press conference after the game "Ball control means advanced "

Referees are enough to give face. Ashraf's flying tackle made the Premier League red

The last chasing the referee's yelling really lost the price

Havertz ran 12 kilometers and slipped the Paris central defender into a dog

Maresca replaced the main league, killing people to kill the heart

When Chelsea gave up the ball and played against the opponent, the opponent was basically cold

Paris fans browsed before the game "Technical poverty alleviation "It's very busy to delete posts now

Referees can stop the game and keep blowing the game. The red card + ban package is late, but it's time to